[loganj]

🤖

Summary

The problem. A Buzz client that watches one channel's details (its name, topic, members) gets them once and then never hears about changes. If someone renames the channel, the client keeps showing the old name until it reloads. A related problem: when a client watches a channel's messages and something community-wide in the same request, the channel's new messages stop arriving.

The fix. The relay (the Buzz server) now decides where to send new events separately for each part of a request, instead of once for the whole request.

Background: how a client watches for events

A client sends the relay a subscription: a request made of one or more filters. Each filter describes some events, for example "messages in channel X" or "the details of channel X". The relay answers in two phases:

1. History. It sends the stored events that match, then a marker that says "history is done".
2. Live. It keeps the subscription open and pushes each new matching event as it arrives.

For the live phase, the relay must decide which new events a subscription may receive. It sorts new events into topics: one topic per channel, plus one community-wide topic for events that belong to no channel. A subscription only hears the topics it signed up for. This is the security boundary that keeps a private channel's events away from people who cannot read it.

Why it broke

The relay picked the topics once for the whole subscription, with one rule: if every filter names its channels with an #h tag, listen to those channels; otherwise, listen only to the community-wide topic.

That rule fails in two cases:

• Channel details. A channel's details are a special event (kind 39000) that the relay signs and stores under the channel itself. Clients ask for it with a #d tag, not #h: {kinds:[39000], "#d":[X]}. Because the filter has no #h, the rule chose the community-wide topic, which never carries channel X's events. The client got the current details in history, and then no updates. (NOSTR.md documented this gap as a future enhancement.)
• Mixed requests. If a request had one filter for channel X's messages and a second filter with no channel, the rule chose community-wide for both. The channel filter silently lost its live messages.

What changes

Each filter now gets its own topics:

Filter	Live events it receives
Names channels with #h	New events in the channels it names and may read
Channel details (kinds 39000–39003) that name channels with #d	Updates for the channels it names and may read, plus community-wide events
Names no channel	Community-wide events, the same as before

The relay then sends a new event only through a filter that both matches the event and listens to that event's channel.

Why this is safe

• No filter can see more than it already could. A filter's channels come only from the channels it names, and each one must pass the same read-permission check the history phase uses. A private channel's outsider gets neither history nor updates (tested).
• One filter cannot widen another. This is the reason for per-filter topics. The simple fix, "add the #d channels to the whole subscription", would leak. Some channels, such as system channels and future channel types, appear only to a filter that names them. With one shared set of topics, a sibling filter such as "all channel details created by person P" (#P) would start to receive live updates for such a channel, even though that channel never appears in its history. fix(relay): show only legacy channel types to reads that name no channel #8469 closed this leak for the history phase. This PR keeps the live phase consistent with it (tested).
• Requests that worked before behave the same. A request whose filters all name #h channels got the union of their channels before. Each filter's own #h condition already rejected the other filters' channels, so per-filter topics deliver exactly the same events. A filter with no channel keeps the community-wide topic, as before.
• Recent joins are not missed. Each server caches who may read which channel for a few seconds, so a server can briefly miss a new member. When a request names channels the cache does not list, the relay checks them against the database. Before, it did this only when every filter used #h. It now checks every channel any filter names, including #d. This matters more now, because a live scope is fixed when the subscription starts: a missed channel would stay missing until the client subscribes again. The check keeps the same token restrictions (tested). More than 2048 #h channels is still refused. More than 2048 named channels in total because of #d is not refused: the #d names then skip this check and live routing, so the request gets history from the cached access set and community-wide live updates, as before this PR. The legacy desktop app sends one unbatched #d query for every channel the user is in (tested).
• Clean up stays exact. A subscription signs up for each topic once, even when several filters name the same channel. It releases each topic once on close, on replacement with the same ID, or when access to a channel is revoked. Revoking one channel removes only that channel; the subscription keeps its other channels and its community-wide topic. The tests check the counts on each path.

Not in scope

A filter that reaches a channel without naming it still gets that channel's events in history but not live. This is unchanged: before this PR, such filters listened only to the community-wide topic too. Examples are a channel-less filter, which history fills with every channel the reader can see, and the "all system channels" opt-in (#t:["system"] or #P).

Related issue

Follow-up to #8469.

Testing

• Two new Postgres tests drive the real request handler. (1) A channel-details subscription receives updates after history, from this server and through the handler that receives other servers' events from Redis. (The test calls that handler directly. It does not cover publishing or Redis transport.) A private channel's outsider receives nothing. (2) In a mixed request, the channel filter and the channel-less filter each keep their live events, and a sibling filter by creator (#P) or system label (#t) does not receive a channel it did not name.
• A Postgres test with a stale access cache: a just-joined channel still reaches both a #d filter and an #h filter beside a channel-less one, in history and live.
• New unit tests cover the per-filter topic rule and the subscription registry.

[jedwards27]

:bot: Jude’s code review agent

Verdict: APPROVE
Reviewed: cd8a9681793fef83001eb44954734b47c1938550..c25057e975d60fd15bb285483ac4028252862f92 (exact head c25057e975d60fd15bb285483ac4028252862f92)
Risk: high — this changes live relay subscription routing, authorization-sensitive channel scope, Redis/local fanout, and replacement/teardown lifecycle.

Behavior/contracts traced: REQ admission; bounded per-filter explicit-channel extraction; cache-negative database repair; channel/system/private read authorization; per-filter topic retention and matching; mixed named/global sibling isolation; local and Redis fanout; replacement, revocation, timeout, close, reconnect, and reference-count cleanup. Independent systems/integration and product/adversarial passes found the implementation preserves each filter’s own channel scope without widening siblings or bypassing send-time access checks.

Findings: no unresolved blocking or non-blocking code/product defect found.
Author action: none.
Verification owner: reviewer/tooling owns any later manual native/Desktop observation; exact-head PostgreSQL, Relay E2E, Backend Integration, Desktop E2E Integration, unit/lint/security, and platform CI own the automated boundary evidence.

Validation at matching clean HEAD:

• cargo test -p buzz-relay --lib subscription::tests — 38 passed.
• cargo test -p buzz-relay --lib handlers::system_channels::tests — 6 passed.
• Focused REQ lifecycle/query regression invocation — 11 passed.
• cargo test -p buzz-relay --lib — 1,516 passed; six unrelated media tests failed while seeding their host-bound fixture with Sqlx(PoolTimedOut) in the reviewer environment. This is an infrastructure confidence gap, not a PR-caused failure.
• Exact-head CI passed PostgreSQL Tests, Relay E2E, Backend Integration, Desktop E2E Integration, Rust lint/unit, Security, and cross-platform gates. PostgreSQL CI explicitly passed named_channels_missing_from_a_stale_cache_still_route_live, group_state_replacements_reach_live_d_subscribers, and named_filters_keep_live_delivery_beside_unnamed_siblings.

Manual/native evidence: not performed; this relay-only source change was validated at the real automated relay/PostgreSQL boundary rather than claimed as manual UI proof.
Residual risk: local Docker/PostgreSQL/Redis reproduction and manual client observation were unavailable. Relevant exact-head integration CI is green; no author action follows from those reviewer-environment gaps. Any new head invalidates this approval.

[wesbillman]

🤖 Star Lord’s automated source review via Wes’s account, integrating independent Rocket (systems/lifecycle), Mantis (correctness/security/concurrency), and Groot (product/client flows) reviews.

No actionable findings; no changes requested.

Reviewed head c25057e975d60fd15bb285483ac4028252862f92 against base/merge-base cd8a9681793fef83001eb44954734b47c1938550. Traced per-filter channel/global routing, token restrictions and stale-cache repair, sibling-filter isolation, indexed matching, local/Redis receive access checks, and topic retention through replacement, revocation, close and disconnect. The source preserves each filter’s own scope while retaining the topic union once per subscription. Reviewed the regression-test seams, unit/PostgreSQL lane selection, relevant client metadata reads, and the public description (no attached images). No actionable disclosure found. Minimalism, clarity and source correctness each meet the repository’s 9/10 review target.

Validation limits: source analysis only; no tests, benchmarks, app launches or PR code execution performed by this review. The cross-pod test calls the Redis receive handler directly; it does not establish Redis publishing/transport behavior. Database concurrency, runtime performance, native accessibility and error/retry focus behavior were not exercised. One read-only CI snapshot for this head showed 76 successful checks, 34 skipped, and one cancelled “Run Codex Security Review”; this is not a complete-green or runtime-validation claim.

This is a non-blocking COMMENT review, not approval or merge authorization.

[github-actions]

🔐 Codex Security Review

Note: This is an automated, security-focused review generated by Codex.
Use it as a supplement to human review; false positives are possible.

Scope

• Exact PR diff: 744f3946f6fe1ff7a649c132638d5af608900dbd...a3b33476490f9b09077624703c5b331f01de8002
• Model: gpt-6.1-sol

💡 Click "edited" above to see earlier reviews for this PR.

---

Review Summary

Overall Risk: NONE

No concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings identified in the authorized PR range.

Findings

No concrete security, correctness, or reliability findings were identified.

Notes

• Review used read-only source and history inspection. Builds and tests were not executed, as instructed.

---

_{Generated by Codex Security Review |
Requested by: @loganj |
Workflow run}

[loganj]

🤖 Fixed the Codex Security Review MEDIUM finding (named-channel limit left the old same-ID holder live) in 7abc88e: the refusal now goes through close::refuse like the #h limit, and in_handler_req_refusal_retires_the_old_holder covers the #d case (red without the fix).

[TheSentinel454]

🤖 Approving at 7abc88e0. One optional, non-blocking note inline.