镜像站点 · 本页由第三方 GitHub 只读镜像提供,非 GitHub 官方站点,不接受任何登录或凭据输入。前往 github.com
Skip to content

About: List Core Libraries #442

Description

@pllim

Please describe the new feature.

In https://github.com/scientific-python/scientific-python.org/blob/main/content/about/_index.md#what-we-do , there is mention of "core libraries" but I cannot immediately find that list. Would be nice if "core libraries" link to that list.

Add any other context about the new feature here, screenshots, etc.

Scipy 2023 BOF session

Activity

  1. tupui commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @tupui
    Member

    Thanks, do you want to make a PR @pllim 😃 ?

  2. pllim commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @pllim
    ContributorAuthor

    I don't know where the list actually is. 😬

  3. stefanv commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @stefanv
    Member

    I'm not sure we want to emphasize that idea too much, since the distinction is to some degree arbitrary, but it's here:

    https://scientific-python.org/specs/core-projects/

  4. jarrodmillman commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @jarrodmillman
    Member

    The core projects were initially meant to be for the SPEC process. And I've been worried about the project being perceived as focused on the core projects. The currently list of core projects for SPECs is a semi-arbitrary list and I am worried that we may not have permission to use their brands in ways extending past the SPECs. At the very least, I think we should get them to endorse more SPECs before using their brands more prominently. We don't want them project maintainers to feel they are being used to promote this project.

    I am not sure what we should do and it is worth discussing more. So far we've gotten explicit agreement from projects to list them where they are listed and we probably should keep it opt-in.

    We had been thinking about emphasizing domain stacks on the main page:

    Maybe that would be a way to proceeed.

  5. pllim commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @pllim
    ContributorAuthor

    From my perspective as "outsider", it is just confusing to see the term "core libraries" without any more info on what those are on that page. So either link to them or remove that term altogether would be less confusing for me. Would be happy to PR if no one get to it first, and you decide what to do. Thanks!

  6. jarrodmillman commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @jarrodmillman
    Member

    What page?

  7. pllim commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @pllim
    ContributorAuthor

    https://scientific-python.org/about/#what-we-do --> "Lecture Notes" bullet point

  8. stefanv commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @stefanv
    Member

    We don't want them project maintainers to feel they are being used to promote this project.

    I agree with this sentiment, and I think there are very few places outside of the SPECs (where it is structurally helpful) to distinguish between "layers" of projects. Generally, I think it's more of a continuum anyway that stretches from foundational through technique specific through domain specific.

  9. jarrodmillman commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @jarrodmillman
    Member

    https://scientific-python.org/about/#what-we-do --> "Lecture Notes" bullet point

    Good catch! Yes, let's remove that. Thanks!! (It is also a different list of core projects than the SPEC core project list.)

  10. added a commit that references this issue on Jul 13, 2023
    9990065
  11. pllim commented on Jul 13, 2023

    @pllim
    ContributorAuthor

    Please see #443

  12. added a commit that references this issue on Jul 13, 2023
    9c9ce9a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions