Repository navigation
governance: add new collaborators #X #5064
Description
Continued discussion from #3761.
Names that have come up so far this round:
- @a0viedo commits, issue comments
- @AndreasMadsen commits, issue comments
- @fansworld-claudio commits, issue comments
- @feross commits, issue comments
- @iwuzhere commits, issue comments
- @jas commits, issue comments
- @jhamhader commits, issue comments
- @john-yan commits, issue comments
- @jwueller commits, issue comments
- @kapouer commits, issue comments
- @matthewloring commits, issue comments
- @obastemur commits, issue comments
- @phillipj commits, issue comments
- @pmq20 commits, issue comments
- @ronkorving commits, issue comments
- @santigimeno commits, issue comments
- @skomski commits, issue comments
- @stefanmb commits, issue comments
- @tflanagan commits, issue comments
- @thekemkid commits, issue comments
- @tomgco commits, [issue comments](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues?page=1&q=commenter%3Atomgco &utf8=%E2%9C%93)
- @whitlockjc commits, issue comments
Activity
evanlucas commentedon Feb 3, 2016
I'd like make sure @matthewloring (commits, issue comments) is nominated too.
cjihrig commentedon Feb 3, 2016
There are a number of other people in #3761 who aren't listed here. I'll make a list.
Fishrock123 commentedon Feb 3, 2016
I suggest we use this format from past threads:
- @{NAME} [commits](https://github.com/nodejs/node/commits/master?author={NAME}), [issue comments](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues?page=1&q=commenter%3A{NAME}&utf8=%E2%9C%93)This gives any of us a quick overview of their activity.
Trott commentedon Feb 3, 2016
@Fishrock123 I've edited the issue description to use that format. Thanks.
GlenTiki commentedon Feb 3, 2016
@Trott I'm awaiting processing too :)
cjihrig commentedon Feb 3, 2016
@thekemkid I'm updating the list and have your name.
GlenTiki commentedon Feb 3, 2016
@cjihrig Cool. So for new readers worried that their name isn't there, don't spam? :)
cjihrig commentedon Feb 3, 2016
OK, I updated the original list.
Trott commentedon Feb 3, 2016
Recent-ish commit activity should not be the only metric we look at of course. (Just stating the obvious for the benefit of outside observers.) But it seems to me that it's far from a useless metric. So here's a list:
based on commits landed since Nov 1 2015
omitting current collaborators
sorted by number of commits
at least two commits in the time frame
35 Tristian Flanagan tflanagan@datacollaborative.com
15 Santiago Gimeno santiago.gimeno@gmail.com
14 Stefan Budeanu stefan@budeanu.com
8 Bryan English bryan@bryanenglish.com
7 Jackson Tian shyvo1987@gmail.com
6 Yazhong Liu yorkiefixer@gmail.com
6 Claudio Rodriguez cjrodr@yahoo.com
6 Alexander Makarenko estliberitas@gmail.com
5 Matt Loring mattloring@google.com
5 Tom Gallacher tomgallacher23@gmail.com
4 Dave dave@jut.io
4 Robert Jefe Lindstaedt robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com
4 Timothy Gu timothygu99@gmail.com
3 Benjamin Gruenbaum inglor@gmail.com
3 Michael Cornacchia cornacch@ca.ibm.com
3 Jonathan Persson persson.jonathan@gmail.com
3 Adam Langley agl@google.com
3 Carl Lei xecycle@gmail.com
3 Jan Schär jscissr@gmail.com
2 Devin Nakamura devinn@ca.ibm.com
2 Andres Suarez zertosh@gmail.com
2 Prayag Verma prayag.verma@gmail.com
2 Kári Tristan Helgason kthelgason@gmail.com
2 Richard Lau riclau@uk.ibm.com
2 Richard Sun rsun@media.ucla.edu
2 Imran Iqbal imrani@ca.ibm.com
2 Ryan Sobol contact@ryansobol.com
2 Sequoia McDowell sequoia.mcdowell@gmail.com
2 Feross Aboukhadijeh feross@feross.org
2 Mudit Ameta zeusdeux@gmail.com
2 Ben Ripkens bripkens.dev@gmail.com
2 zoubin zoubin04@gmail.com
estliberitas commentedon Feb 3, 2016
Wow, I must do more useful contribs to get into org. Good motivation.
jbergstroem commentedon Feb 3, 2016
@Trott how about getting the number of commits and comments into the first message? I reckon activity is is a good way to show engagement.
pmq20 commentedon Feb 4, 2016
Thanks for nominating. Though recently being absent due to work, I'd be contributing more if I was officially on board.
whitlockjc commentedon Feb 4, 2016
PRs wouldn't be bad as well if we're looking for total work.
MylesBorins commentedon Feb 5, 2016
I'd be willing to help with onboarding if ya'll need help
39 remaining items
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
Fishrock123 commentedon Mar 11, 2016
Ons set of people down! 🎉
ronkorving commentedon Mar 12, 2016
Sweet! :)
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
Trott commentedon Mar 18, 2016
This happened, so I'm going to close this and open one for a new round to hopefully pick up some of the people that were missed in this round.
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
doc: add benjamingr to collaborator list
stefanmb commentedon Mar 22, 2016
@Trott If nominated in the first post, how do we know if we're actually selected to be onboarded?
Trott commentedon Mar 22, 2016
@stefanmb In this particular case, @Fishrock123 posted a Doodle link and asked anyone who was listed to fill it out so he could figure a good time to onboard people.
So, if you missed this round of onboarding and want to get in on the next round, maybe leave a comment at #5779 (which is the issue for the next round) saying that you missed the last round but would be interested.
A more concrete process might be in order (or maybe not) and the CTC might discuss it tomorrow. (I've added onboarding as an agenda item but I don't know how much time there will be or how much interest there will be in getting too deep into the weeds on it.)