镜像站点 · 本页由第三方 GitHub 只读镜像提供,非 GitHub 官方站点,不接受任何登录或凭据输入。前往 github.com
Skip to content

Don't recommend to install '@types/foo' if that already exists - #24815

Merged
4 commits merged into
masterfrom
untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist
Jun 21, 2018
Merged

4 commits merged into
masterfrom
untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist

Conversation

@ghost

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #24781

@DanielRosenwasser

Daniel Rosenwasser (DanielRosenwasser) commented Jun 9, 2018 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Almost there - I think it'd be helpful to say that if this resolved from an @types location, that we should elaborate with

If the '{0}' package actually exposes this module, consider sending a pull request to amend 'https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/{0}`

@ghost
ghost merged commit 2b9166b into master Jun 21, 2018
@ghost
ghost deleted the untypedModuleImport_noImplicitAny_typesForPackageExist branch June 21, 2018 17:19
@microsoft Microsoft (microsoft) locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2025
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants