Repository navigation
fix(EC-2188): limit release PR builds to linux amd64 - #3602
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
📝 Walkthrough
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | The title clearly states that release PR builds will be limited to Linux AMD64 and includes the related ticket. | |
| Description check | The description explains what changes, why it changes, and links the related EC-2188 ticket. It covers the required template information despite not using the template headings. | |
| Docstring Coverage | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1… | |
| Linked Issues check | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. | |
| Out of Scope Changes check | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Create a new PR
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
Risk Assessment: low (1/5) DetailsMinimal two-file XS configuration change with no security sensitivity, no CI workflow impact, no dependency changes, and a single known author - composite score 1.24 rounds to 1 (low). Previous runRisk Assessment: low (1/5) DetailsTwo-file, three-line config-only change with small blast radius, no protected or security-sensitive paths, no CI or dependency modifications, a known author with minimal churn history, and a scope that precisely matches the stated issue; all signals converge at the lowest risk tier. Previous run (2)Risk Assessment: low (1/5) DetailsXS configuration-only change by a seasoned author limiting release builds to linux/amd64, touching no protected paths, security-sensitive files, or CI workflow definitions, with stable file history and a single prior fix commit yielding a composite near 1. |
|
Looks good to me Previous runLooks good to me Previous run (2)Looks good to me |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
st3penta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. this probably just needs a rebase to pass CI
Superseded by updated review
Use a release-specific pre-merge build-args file when generating release branch pipelines. Keep post-merge builds unmodified so they continue to build every supported platform. Co-authored-by: OpenAI Codex <noreply@openai.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Smid <jsmid@redhat.com>
Superseded by updated review
|
Retro on PR #3602 ( What happened. Human-authored 2-file config change (one-line edit to Review quality. No human reviewer added inline change requests that the agent missed, and the agent did not flag anything a human later overruled. Low-complexity config change, correctly handled. Rework rate. Zero iterations — one commit, one rebase, no fix cycle. Autonomy readiness. For this class of change (small, additive release-pipeline config under Existing-issue check. Related open retro-filed issues were reviewed and no new proposal is warranted:
Dispatch repo confirmed as |
Use a release-specific pre-merge build-args file when generating release branch pipelines. Keep post-merge builds unmodified so they continue to build every supported platform.
Resolves: EC-2188