镜像站点 · 本页由第三方 GitHub 只读镜像提供,非 GitHub 官方站点,不接受任何登录或凭据输入。前往 github.com
Skip to content

fix(agents): add effort to launch-boundary Goose test fixture - #1263

Closed
salman1993 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/fix-launch-boundary-effort
Closed

salman1993 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/fix-launch-boundary-effort

Conversation

@salman1993

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem

tsc --noEmit fails on main, so every open PR's JavaScript CI jobs fail at "Lint and types" (failing main run):

src/features/agents/launch-boundary.test.ts(560,5): error TS2741: Property 'effort' is missing ...
src/features/agents/launch-boundary.test.ts(596,5): error TS2741: Property 'effort' is missing ...

Two PRs that each passed CI on their own combined to cause this:

Change

Add effort: "" to GOOSE_LOCAL. This is Goose's own default (src/bundled/goose/runtime.ts), and the Claude fixture in the same file uses the same value. It's a test-only change; production types are unchanged.

Testing

  • tsc --noEmit is clean on top of ccd1be519 (current main).
  • vitest run src/features/agents/launch-boundary.test.ts: 4 passed.
  • Pre-commit and pre-push hooks pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

#1185 added GOOSE_LOCAL without `effort`, and #1250 made `effort`
required on the Goose launch config. Each passed CI alone; together
they break `tsc` on main. Use Goose's own default, `effort: ""`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Salman Mohammed <smohammed@squareup.com>
@salman1993
salman1993 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2026 16:35
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T16:37:14.484197Z 8503378 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8503378ad6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@salman1993

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

#1262 (review)

@salman1993 salman1993 closed this Oct 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant