Repository navigation
Add Quickwit support #95
Description
Would be nice to see Quickwit comparison as well since at least ElasticSearch is supported here right now.
Pinging @fulmicoton - probably you could be interested in it at least from the perspective "where Quickwit performance could be improved compared to other engines".
Activity
fulmicoton commentedon Apr 2, 2023
@zamazan4ik Oh that would be awesome. Unfortunately Quickwit does not handle SQL at the moment.
I eyeballed the SQL queries... Maybe we can perform the same computation in Quickwit 0.5 with the JSON DSL.
Would that be ok or do we need to support SQL?
zamazan4ik commentedon Apr 2, 2023
I think it would be ok, since here authors mention the possibility to improve performance via rewriting queries into the native DSL.
fulmicoton commentedon Apr 3, 2023
I had a look at the bench. Maybe we cannot perform all of the queries yet, but it seems like the benchmark is pretty flexible and will run the queries we can run.
The set of queries is not really friendly to search engines, but it should still be very instructive for us.
alexey-milovidov commentedon Apr 22, 2023
It's ok to add a DBMS without SQL support.
For example, see MongoDB: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/blob/main/mongodb/queries.js
alexey-milovidov commentedon Apr 22, 2023
Looking forward to seeing Quickwit added!
rschu1ze commentedon Nov 14, 2025
ClickHouse/JSONBench#104 adds Quickwit to JSONBench. Perhaps we can add to ClickBench as well? @cometkim
cometkim commentedon Nov 18, 2025
I'm not sure how many queries Quickwit can cover. Let me try.
alexey-milovidov commentedon May 8, 2026
Reconsidering my forward-looking approach.
alexey-milovidov commentedon May 8, 2026
#865